This session considers the steps required to get an article published. We cover the whole publishing process in the current landscape including:
selecting a publication
avoiding predatory publishers
submitting an article
open access options
depositing in Pure
considering the REF
Attendees will benefit from gaining a holistic, contemporary view of the publishing process that provides context and clarity. In addition, we share tips and advice to help you avoid making mistakes saving you time and avoiding stressful situations.
What is GDPR and how does it affect you as a researcher? If you collect any personal information as part of your research, you need to know what it means for your work, and how to protect your research data, yourself and the rights of your participants/data subjects.
is an increasing emphasis on measuring research in society, with the REF just
one example of this. Researchers too, are being encouraged to ‘play the numbers
game’ and their research outputs are being evaluated in quantitative ways such
as by citations, societal impacts, etc. Such an environment can be particularly
difficult for early career researchers to negotiate.
session introduces established measures including the H-index and newer
approaches such as altmetrics. It also considers the limitations of such
measures, and prepares early career researchers for their research activity
being subject to measurement.
Attendees will leave the session with an awareness of the range of indicators used to measure research, why these are applied, and how they are calculated. Furthermore, you will know how to critique certain measures when applied inappropriately and adapt to this by signposting your own outputs.
Have you thought about using NVIVO for qualitative research? This session will introduce how NVIVO can be used for managing large amounts of data at its most basic level. It will provide an orientation to the basic NVIVO interface and explore how the data-coding-analysis-interpretation process of qualitative research can be supported by NVIVO using an example from a live project. Together we will reflect on what NVIVO may, or may not, be able to do for qualitative researchers.
This small group workshop is aimed at early career researchers; the content focuses on journal articles, though is applicable to other kinds of research outputs such as book chapters.
Attendees are invited to consider the focus of their writing including key arguments, rationale, etc. before moving on to targeting suitable journals and providing advice engaging with the peer review process.
After attending, you will know to write effective applications to appropriate journals in which to publish your work and can take an active role in the peer review process.
Delivered by Prof Jo Crotty, Director ISR, Prof Owen Evans, Dept of Media, EHU, and Prof Derek Heim, Dept of Psychology, EHU
In this session three experienced RCUK reviewers will take you through a number of funded and unfunded bids to dissect what makes a good grant proposal. The session will also offer ‘hints’ and ‘tips’ for successful grant bidding.
Edge Hill University’s cross-disciplinary research and knowledge exchange initiative. Established in 2013, as the Institute for Public Policy and Professional Practice, the Institute’s remit has grown to critically examine broad conceptualisations of social responsibility across the social sciences, arts and humanities. The Institute is committed to exploring the opportunities for cross sector collaboration and co-operation and to draw on the experience of practitioners as well as academic researchers to inform new ways of working and learning.
The session will introduce new academic staff or those new to research to some of the key aspects of Focus Group Methodology. The sessions will also enable participants to gain some experience of looking at a focus group transcript and thinking about the advantages and disadvantages of using this method for their own academic research.
At the end of session you will have:
a greater understanding of focus groups as a qualitative method
experience of reviewing a focus group transcript
enhanced your ability to identify the advantages and disadvantages of collecting data using Focus Groups
Aimed at helping research students and staff showcase their work and stand out from the crowd, this workshop focuses on building a highly visible researcher profile across platforms such as Google Scholar, LinkedIn, ResearchGate, ORCiD and more. The benefits of this approach in terms of employability, research impact, prestige and more are explained.
The session includes Information about how Careers can support you during your research plus resources for career planning.
The session involves small group discussion and creating personal profiles on various academic and professional/social platforms. You may wish to have a digital photo of yourself ready for uploading.
Learn how to update,
create and relate your content in Pure, including:
Review your account settings
Maintain your academic staff profile
Apply for research funding
Monitor your funding awards
Combine your content to create a `project’
Propose an output for REF2021
Generate a CV from all your content
Navigate the research information repository
This practical session is for academic staff, known as ‘personal users’ in Pure.
For the first hour, you will be logged in to your own Pure account while the facilitator explains the different screens and functions, such as updating your profile, creating and relating content. The rest of the session is time for you to ask additional detailed questions, or just put what you have learnt into practice