Author(s): Bresnahan R.; Panebianco M.; Marson A.G.

Source: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Mar 2019; vol. 2019 (no. 3)

Publication Date: Mar 2019

Publication Type(s): Review

Available  at Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews –  from Cochrane Collaboration (Wiley)

Abstract:Background Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. It is estimated that up to 30% of patients with epilepsy continue to have epileptic seizures despite treatment with an antiepileptic drug. These patients are classified as drug-resistant and require treatment with a combination of multiple antiepileptic drugs. Brivaracetam is a third-generation antiepileptic drug that is a high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A. This review investigates the use of brivaracetam as add-on therapy for epilepsy. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of brivaracetam when used as add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant epilepsy. Search methods We searched the following databases on 9 October 2018: the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Medline (Ovid) 1946 to 8 October 2018;; and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ( ICTRP). Originally we also searched SCOPUS as a substitute for Embase, but this is no longer necessary, because randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials in Embase are now included in CENTRAL. Selection criteria We sought randomised controlled trialswith parallel-group design, recruiting people of any agewith drug-resistant epilepsy.We accepted studies with any level of blinding (double-blind, single-blind, or unblind). Data collection and analysis In accordance with standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration, two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion before evaluating trial quality and extracting relevant data. The primary outcome to be assessed was 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency. Secondary outcomes were: seizure freedom, treatment withdrawal for any reason, treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, the proportion of participants who experienced any adverse events, and drug interactions. We used an intention-to-treat (ITT) population for all primary analyses, and we presented results as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley and Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Database: EMBASE