Author(s): Ghazali N.; Jones T.; Shaw R.; Risk J.; Lowe D.; Brown J.; Rogers S.N.; Roe B.; Tandon S.
Source: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology; May 2017; vol. 274 (no. 5); p. 2253-2260
Publication Date: May 2017
Publication Type(s): Article
Abstract:The primary aim was to determine the efficacy of the Distress Thermometer (DT) in screening for anxiety and mood problems against the University of Washington Quality of Life, version 4 (UWQOL). Secondary aims were to evaluate the association between demographic, clinical and health-related QOL variables with significant distress. Two hundred and sixty one disease-free HNC ambulatory patients attending routine follow-up clinics were prospectively recruited. Both DT and UWQOL were completed pre-consultation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses of DT score for anxiety dysfunction yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.877, with a sensitivity of 84% (43/51) and specificity of 76% (159/210) for a DT cut-off of >=4; with a corresponding AUC of 0.825 for mood with sensitivity 78% (28/36) and specificity 71% (159/225). Treatment with radiotherapy and a longer consultation time were associated with significant distress (DT >=4). Significant distress was also reported in two third of those reporting less than “Good” overall QOL. Distress levels were particularly associated with poor Social-Emotional function, more so than the association seen with poor physical function. DT is a reasonable screening tool for distress in the HNC population. The DT cut-off score >=4 was effective in identifying those with significant distress. Significant distress is associated in survivors with poor health-related quality of life, those who received radiotherapy and patients who have longer consultation times in clinic.
Copyright © 2017, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Database: EMBASE